1. Found the password, it was a ceaser 9 cypher tried the login on all public account names. Got in with arodriguez.
  2. When I was testing passwords on all the users
  3. 7 because i agree with cvss, but I believe that it can be avoided with good configuration so I think their score of 7.5 is too high.
  4. They did not want to pay for security, and they believed in security by obscurity
  5. I disagree, as there is no such thing as an internal problem only. I also believe that security by obscurity is an incorrect assumption. Also a bad actor will lose them more money then losing the contract.
  6. Security by obscurity (Changed port)
  7. No this is because yet again security by obscurity is not an effective strategy, They could have implemented a system in which they separated their internal networks.
  8. No You should just solve vulnerabilities when you have a way to do so, like this company
  9. medium risk is as high as I would go with acceptance, this is related to the fact that you can push risk onto other people using contractors. Higher then that is negligent.
  10. The only person who can accept the fault is Sarah Johnson, because she approved/accepted the risk.